HISTORY of BRITAIN FROM THE FLOOD TO A.D. 700
BY RICHARD WILLIAMS MORGAN, 1848
The incident last week when the Open Library went down reminds us how tenuously held works in the public domain are, and how sure obscurity is for these works the moment human eyes are no longer on them. We keep our history vibrant only by reading it. The academy spent 20 years scanning in all the old books so that they wouldn’t have to take the expense of caring for the physical copies. Perhaps this was a step in the destruction of the public library, the set of books available to the public. Now that the old books are digitized, they can be deleted. They can be controlled. It’s possible to know who is reading them.
With that in mind, I’d like to share a book that I’ve just finished reading. It’s a good read: Morgan’s History of Britain, 1848.
Hello to all new subscribers. You can donate if you’d like, but nothing is paywalled. Check out the archive if you’re interested in the suppressed biblical works of King James 1 of England.
P.
Thank you, Palambron, for bringing forward this important information.
Yes, Morgan is a very important writer from a time before the re-writing of British history was complete. The Hanoverians are not descended from the Trojans and, when they acceded to the throne in 1714, they set about systematically re-writing "British" history to give the "British" a Germanic Anglo-Saxon heritage in order to strengthen the weak legitimacy of their reign; but, even in England, only a small minority of the English were actually Anglo-Saxon. The idea that there were ever any Celts in The British Isles is also Hanoverian propaganda, lies and nonsense.
Chief Justice, Sir Edward Coke (1552-1634), recorded a British legal convention that required a British monarch to be a descendant of Brutus of Troy. In 1714, there were countless people in Britain with a stronger right of succession than the Hanoverians; but it is parliament that decides who sits on the throne; and, in those days (and still of course today), parliament was/is controlled by the banking interests, who came to Britain in 1688 from Babylon via Judea, Rome, Venice and Amsterdam.
In those days, the "British" people and language were what today we call "Welsh." In those days, the English did not think of themselves as "British." The history recorded by Morgan was still taught in Welsh schools until about a century ago. But no longer.
Another relevant and important book, which draws on Morgan's work, was published earlier this year:
"The Great Migrations to Britain of 1527 B.C. and 485 B.C.," by Marchell Abrahams
https://williamcongreve.co.uk/books/p3qeyjknbrkd6bmk/the-great-migrations-to-britain-of-1527-bc-and-485-bc/
There is much more on this subject here:
https://www.thenationalcv.org.uk/more.html
https://www.cymroglyphics.com/
https://www.youtube.com/@BritainsHiddenHistoryRoss
"On equally solid grounds of evidence the social state of Britain has been described as, from its first settlement by Hu the Mighty, that of a civilized and polished community. Had no other monument of Kymric antiquity but the Code of British Laws of Molmutius (B.C. 600), which still forms the basis of our common or unwritten law, descended to us, we could not doubt that we were handling the index of civilization of a very high order. In such a code we possess not only the most splendid relic of pre-Roman Europe, but the key to all our British--as contra-distinguished from Continental--institutions. After perusing it, we stand amazed at the blindness which wanders groping for the origin of British rights and liberties in the swamps of the motherland of feudal serfdom--Germany. We need not go so far as to affirm, with a learned author, that "barbarism and slavish institutions first entered Britain with the German Saxon"; but we may safely contend that no part of the Continent could supply Britain with what it never possessed itself. British spirit and freedom are wholly of native British origin, and out of Britain they are imitations or fallacies, not realities. The Continent is an aggregate of nations ruled on the despotic principle. The Anglo-Saxon of America returns, out of Britain, to just what the Anglo-Saxon of Germany and England was: a seller and driver of slaves."
Intresting. It calls to mind what has been said about the people from Aldebaran, known as the Aryan ETs, who made contact with German occultists through Maria Orsic in the 1930s.