FWIW, William of Orange's wife and co-monarch, Mary, was the elder daughter of William's maternal uncle James, Duke of York, the younger brother of King Charles II, who became King James II when Charles died in 1685.
William was King Charles I's grandson through Charles's daughter (also named Mary).
William defeated his Uncle James at the so-called "Battle" of The Boyne in Ireland in 1690, which was more of a ritual than a battle.
In my opinion, the so-called "Glorious" Revolution of 1688, which brought William to power in The British Isles, was the culmination of a long struggle, which began when King Edward I expelled the Jews from England in 1290.
The Jews wanted to be re-admitted. They backed Cromwell and parliament against Charles I in The English Civil War (1642-51) and won. In 1656, Cromwell allowed the Jews back into England.
After the Restoration of Charles II in 1660, the Jews renewed their opposition to the Stuarts by refusing to fund the government. In revenge for this and for the execution of his father, Charles ordered that The City be burned - The Great Fire of London (1666). The story of the fire starting in a bakery on Pudding Lane is pure fabrication.
The Jews finally toppled the Stuarts in the "Glorious" Revolution, which was really a coup d'etat. Since then, British monarchs have been their puppets. Except I don't think it was really the "Jews." It was The Black Nobility of Venice, hiding behind Jews/Jewishness/antisemitism as they still do today, who reached London via Amsterdam, Venice, Rome, Judea and Babylon over thousands of years. Since then, they have gone on to control all the NATO/Five-Eyes countries, Israel, Ukraine and others.
I find Trump hard to read. It does look like he is re-structuring a bankrupt corporation and it is difficult to see the bankers doing well in such circumstances. It is generally accepted that Trump, like Putin and Xi, is a nationalist, not a globalist, and therefore not working for The Black Nobs. On the other hand, his links with Rothschild, the Jesuits and the Zionists/Israel, to name but three, suggest that he could indeed be an agent of The Black Nobs and planning to implement "The Great Taking" described in David Webb's book and video.
And then of course Miles Mathis thinks that Trump is himself Jewish:
Thank you for always writing such interesting posts.
BTW, also interesting to note that The Bank of England was nationalised/taken into public ownership by the Attlee (Labour) government in 1946. Whether that means the Rothschilds have more, or less, control of the bank as a result is something else I wish I knew!
You wrote that Jefferson "said, by a process of inflation and deflation, the corporations that grew up around the banks (USA federal incorporated government), would seize all the property, and Americans would be homeless in the land that their forefathers conquered."
This reminds me of The Emergency Banking Act 1933, which declared the federal government bankrupt and dissolved both the federal government and the Republic. The actual banking emergency was declared because of the insolvency of the government (Executive Order 6073, 6102, 6111, 6260; Senate Report 93-549, pp 187 & 594, 1973).
A new currency had to be introduced. “The new money (paper promissory notes) is issued to the banks in return for Government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances, and banker’s acceptances. The new money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.” Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congressional Record, 1st Session.
How many people alive today have been taught about this?!
Plausible, in that I have already told my daughter that a downturn is inevitable (she is in real estate / property management). While I am delighted to see so much fraud cancelled, I also believe the GDP is so dependent on government spending and employment that it must fall. It is also dependent on the spending provided for and by the vast numbers of "undocumented" people. It is very difficult to make predictions at this point.
Fortunately, you have it exactly backward. DJT & friends are taking down the BOE (and also the ECB, and probably every other 3rd world central/commercial bank that's issued significant offshore-dollar loans).
The evidence of this has been accumulated by Tom Lluongo and Stormy Waters on what is now dozens of hours of podcasts. Look through the issues of my newsletter, I've chronicled every one I can find.
The exposure of the vast criminality makes that a highly risky, unlikely part of the plan unless these socio-psychopaths plan to unleash an army of drones using all sorts of advanced tech, killer robots on the ground, and various other methods this sick death cult loves, including their modRNA & other technologies, and it would make Trump the most devious POTUS in the history of the U.S. and put him the company of the Nero or worse in the category of socio-psychopathic leaders of empires. What belies your assertion is primarily the odd aspects of the exposure of the nature of Trump that point to divine providence. It's not just the Lockwood Baron Trump's underground adventures from 1889, with all its coincidences, it's also the William Delschau artwork from that period that shows UFO's with the name Trump at the top if the canvas, and 45 at the bottom. Then there's the one novel by Werner Von Braun, whose mother was highly psychic, in which a man named Elon was in charge of Mars. We'll see soon enough if your contention is true.
Instead of UBI, we get Dividends for all the tax & public resources spent over generations in R&D and given to for profit corporations. Take a look and decide if a good idea.
Monthly 'Universal Dividend Income' calculation.
----------------
Detailed Description of the Universal Dividend Income Formula and Results
This formulation explores how the total income generated by wage suppression since 1979, along with government policies, could be redistributed to create a Universal Dividend Income for all legal adult citizens in the United States. We will examine the wage-productivity gap, capital policies, government programs, and how redistribution could result in monthly payouts for citizens.
1. Background: Wage Suppression and the Wage-Productivity Gap Since 1979
The period since 1979 has seen a separation between wage growth and productivity. Prior to this, wages and productivity had moved in tandem, meaning as productivity (the amount of goods or services a worker can produce in an hour) increased, so too did wages. However, since 1979, wages have failed to keep up with the rising productivity of workers.
1979 to 2024:
Productivity has increased by approximately 80.9% since 1979, meaning that the average worker today produces nearly 81% more than they did in 1979.
Wages, on the other hand, have only increased by around 29.4% during this time. This discrepancy between the growth in productivity and the stagnation of wages is a direct result of capital policies such as:
Deregulation and tax cuts for corporations and high-income earners.
The decline of unions, reducing workers' bargaining power.
The rise of financialization (e.g., stock buybacks, executive compensation) that focuses more on shareholder returns rather than reinvesting in labor or increasing wages.
This wage suppression—where profits have been funneled primarily to capital (business owners, executives, shareholders) instead of being shared with labor—has contributed to the wage-productivity gap, leaving millions of workers without the benefits of their own increased productivity.
2. Calculating the Wage Gap and Redistributing Capital Profits
To estimate the potential Universal Dividend Income, we need to look at the wage gap created by the productivity-wage divergence.
Median Wage vs. Hypothetical Wage (if wages had kept pace with productivity):
Median Hourly Wage in 1979 (in nominal dollars): $7.36
Adjusted for inflation to 2024 dollars: This equals approximately $22.00 to $23.00 per hour (based on the CPI).
Productivity Increase (1979 to 2024): Productivity has increased by 80.9%.
Hypothetical Median Wage (had wages kept pace with productivity): Hypothetical Median Wage = 22.00 × (1 + 0.809) = 22.00 × 1.809 = 39.80 per hour.
Actual Median Wage in 2024: Around $19.33 per hour.
Wage Difference: The difference between the hypothetical wage (if wages had kept pace with productivity) and the actual wage is: 39.80 - 19.33 = 20.47 per hour. For a full-time worker (approximately 173.2 hours per month): Monthly Wage Gap = 20.47 × 173.2 ≈ 3,543 per month.
Thus, each worker would theoretically have been earning an additional 3,543 per month had wages kept pace with productivity growth.
Redistribution of Capital Profits: The wage gap indicates that capital profits (from increased productivity) have not been fairly shared with labor. In this redistribution model, this increase would be shared among all 250 million legal adult citizens.
The wage increase per citizen per month can be calculated by: Monthly Redistribution per Adult = (250,000,000 × 3,543) / 333,000,000 ≈ 2,659 per adult per month.
Thus, 2,659 per month could be redistributed to each legal adult citizen, based on the wages they should have been earning had they been properly compensated for productivity growth.
3. Social Security, Welfare, and Other Government Payments
In addition to wage increases, the U.S. government provides various welfare programs, such as Social Security, food stamps, housing assistance, and Medicaid. These payments represent a significant source of income redistribution.
Total Annual Welfare Spending: The U.S. government spends approximately 3 trillion dollars per year on welfare programs.
Welfare Spending per Citizen: Annual Welfare Spending per Citizen = 3,000,000,000,000 / 333,000,000 ≈ 9,000 per citizen annually. Monthly Welfare Spending per Citizen = 9,000 / 12 ≈ 750 per citizen per month.
Thus, each citizen currently receives about 750 per month on average from welfare programs.
4. Combining the Two: The Universal Dividend Income
Now, let’s combine both the redistributed wage increase and the welfare payments:
Redistributed Wage Increase: 2,659 per adult per month.
Welfare and Social Security Payments: 750 per citizen per month.
Total monthly amount for each legal adult citizen would be: 2,659 + 750 = 3,409 per adult per month.
For Families with Children: Parents of dependent children would receive 1/3 of the adult amount for each child: 3,409 / 3 ≈ 1,136 per child per month.
5. Summary of Results: Universal Dividend Income
In this Universal Dividend Income model:
Adults (18+ years): Each legal adult citizen would receive around 3,409 per month.
Each Child: For each dependent child, parents would receive an additional 1,136 per month.
This model seeks to redistribute the income generated by increased productivity and the capital profits that have been hoarded since 1979, while also including welfare benefits into the equation. The result is a significant monthly payout that ensures more equitable distribution of wealth across all citizens, which could help combat rising inequality, provide a stronger safety net for families, and increase overall economic stability.
Conclusion:
The wage suppression since 1979—driven by capital policies and the decline of labor protections—has led to an economy where productivity has increased dramatically without a corresponding rise in worker wages. By redistributing the wage-productivity gap along with current welfare payments, the Universal Dividend Income model proposes a more equitable income distribution, offering 3,409 per month for each legal adult and a proportional amount for children. This would provide a substantial economic boost, particularly to low- and middle-income households, and could help restore economic stability and fairness.
This UDI is phase one of the biosecurity state. Of course, you'll have to be vaxxed and tracked to gain access to your crypto-income, eventually. They'll have total control of calories, and can turn off your calories, if you don't comply or because they don't like your DNA (for any reason, or none). I'm not buying what they're selling.
There were many points to my comment about the UDI, but to address your objection I would say that Social Security is widespread and has not been abused in the way you fear, not because we can trust Washington but because it is so widespread that such abuse would bring backlash from across Classes and ages (adult children that respond for parents sake but for their future.)
A reason to present the UDI is to display why and how badly Gov & Capital has treated us while depending on our tax and public resources. Had wages followed productivity each of our wages and salaries would be double while corporations would still be profiting as they were in late 1970's and earlier.
The Dividend aspect direct us all to consider it like SS pensions, all our working lives we paid into it, FICA, and so it is earned and not some freebe charity whim of Washington, our grandfathers, fathers, mothers, brothers, .., and we have been supporting corporate businesses with free R&D results, public resources, and tax-paid resources. The profits of the Trillions we spent and still spend are given-away and have been for generations of our labor.
You and family under UDI may still work and perhaps invest the extra. Consider the small business created and-or expanded, as well as new capital in stock purchases. The 'investment' Class would expand - perhaps including nearly everyone.
I hope this provides you a better perspective, and consideration of UDI. Let me know if you would like more detail or if you have specific objections not addressed.
So, we Americans are supposed to take the USA company's offered payout, in exchange for our liberty, and in lieu of the real money (gold and silver) that we are owed (damages from fraud)? There is no such thing as a free agent. If you're an agent, you're not free. The incorporated USA already considers us to be its agents (all of us with birth certificates), but that is a fraud. When we pay federal taxes, we (of our own volition) participate in this corporation's fraud, extortion, and racketeering. Our ignorance of the law is no excuse. We, the complicit taxpayers, can be sued for damages in civil court for paying our federal taxes (an illegal protection racket).
I'd like us to notice the evil crimes that this corporation, the USA, is doing. The murders through chemical (medical) and biological warfare against the American people. The murders through foreign wars. Do we believe we are not personally culpable and liable for damages from the crimes that our federally contracted entity has done and is doing? Are we willing to correct our wrong beliefs, and become lawful people, or are we to continue to blunder along in our ignorance and complicity with this criminal organization?
FWIW, William of Orange's wife and co-monarch, Mary, was the elder daughter of William's maternal uncle James, Duke of York, the younger brother of King Charles II, who became King James II when Charles died in 1685.
William was King Charles I's grandson through Charles's daughter (also named Mary).
William defeated his Uncle James at the so-called "Battle" of The Boyne in Ireland in 1690, which was more of a ritual than a battle.
In my opinion, the so-called "Glorious" Revolution of 1688, which brought William to power in The British Isles, was the culmination of a long struggle, which began when King Edward I expelled the Jews from England in 1290.
The Jews wanted to be re-admitted. They backed Cromwell and parliament against Charles I in The English Civil War (1642-51) and won. In 1656, Cromwell allowed the Jews back into England.
After the Restoration of Charles II in 1660, the Jews renewed their opposition to the Stuarts by refusing to fund the government. In revenge for this and for the execution of his father, Charles ordered that The City be burned - The Great Fire of London (1666). The story of the fire starting in a bakery on Pudding Lane is pure fabrication.
The Jews finally toppled the Stuarts in the "Glorious" Revolution, which was really a coup d'etat. Since then, British monarchs have been their puppets. Except I don't think it was really the "Jews." It was The Black Nobility of Venice, hiding behind Jews/Jewishness/antisemitism as they still do today, who reached London via Amsterdam, Venice, Rome, Judea and Babylon over thousands of years. Since then, they have gone on to control all the NATO/Five-Eyes countries, Israel, Ukraine and others.
I find Trump hard to read. It does look like he is re-structuring a bankrupt corporation and it is difficult to see the bankers doing well in such circumstances. It is generally accepted that Trump, like Putin and Xi, is a nationalist, not a globalist, and therefore not working for The Black Nobs. On the other hand, his links with Rothschild, the Jesuits and the Zionists/Israel, to name but three, suggest that he could indeed be an agent of The Black Nobs and planning to implement "The Great Taking" described in David Webb's book and video.
And then of course Miles Mathis thinks that Trump is himself Jewish:
https://mileswmathis.com/trump.pdf
whatever that might mean.
I REALLY wish I knew!
Thank you for adding so much historical detail and context.
Thank you for always writing such interesting posts.
BTW, also interesting to note that The Bank of England was nationalised/taken into public ownership by the Attlee (Labour) government in 1946. Whether that means the Rothschilds have more, or less, control of the bank as a result is something else I wish I knew!
You wrote that Jefferson "said, by a process of inflation and deflation, the corporations that grew up around the banks (USA federal incorporated government), would seize all the property, and Americans would be homeless in the land that their forefathers conquered."
This reminds me of The Emergency Banking Act 1933, which declared the federal government bankrupt and dissolved both the federal government and the Republic. The actual banking emergency was declared because of the insolvency of the government (Executive Order 6073, 6102, 6111, 6260; Senate Report 93-549, pp 187 & 594, 1973).
A new currency had to be introduced. “The new money (paper promissory notes) is issued to the banks in return for Government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances, and banker’s acceptances. The new money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.” Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congressional Record, 1st Session.
How many people alive today have been taught about this?!
So they’re running the country like a bankrupt corporation; cutting expenses and increasing revenue.
Yes, I guess that is correct. Trump is doing to USA inc. what Isaiah Thomas did to the CBA. Maybe that's why Denmark offered to buy California (joke).
I like the idea of Denmark owning CA, it would be an improvement and Denmark could make Solvang (little Denmark in CA) the capital.
Solvang, California - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solvang,_California
Plausible, in that I have already told my daughter that a downturn is inevitable (she is in real estate / property management). While I am delighted to see so much fraud cancelled, I also believe the GDP is so dependent on government spending and employment that it must fall. It is also dependent on the spending provided for and by the vast numbers of "undocumented" people. It is very difficult to make predictions at this point.
Fortunately, you have it exactly backward. DJT & friends are taking down the BOE (and also the ECB, and probably every other 3rd world central/commercial bank that's issued significant offshore-dollar loans).
The evidence of this has been accumulated by Tom Lluongo and Stormy Waters on what is now dozens of hours of podcasts. Look through the issues of my newsletter, I've chronicled every one I can find.
The exposure of the vast criminality makes that a highly risky, unlikely part of the plan unless these socio-psychopaths plan to unleash an army of drones using all sorts of advanced tech, killer robots on the ground, and various other methods this sick death cult loves, including their modRNA & other technologies, and it would make Trump the most devious POTUS in the history of the U.S. and put him the company of the Nero or worse in the category of socio-psychopathic leaders of empires. What belies your assertion is primarily the odd aspects of the exposure of the nature of Trump that point to divine providence. It's not just the Lockwood Baron Trump's underground adventures from 1889, with all its coincidences, it's also the William Delschau artwork from that period that shows UFO's with the name Trump at the top if the canvas, and 45 at the bottom. Then there's the one novel by Werner Von Braun, whose mother was highly psychic, in which a man named Elon was in charge of Mars. We'll see soon enough if your contention is true.
Instead of UBI, we get Dividends for all the tax & public resources spent over generations in R&D and given to for profit corporations. Take a look and decide if a good idea.
Monthly 'Universal Dividend Income' calculation.
----------------
Detailed Description of the Universal Dividend Income Formula and Results
This formulation explores how the total income generated by wage suppression since 1979, along with government policies, could be redistributed to create a Universal Dividend Income for all legal adult citizens in the United States. We will examine the wage-productivity gap, capital policies, government programs, and how redistribution could result in monthly payouts for citizens.
1. Background: Wage Suppression and the Wage-Productivity Gap Since 1979
The period since 1979 has seen a separation between wage growth and productivity. Prior to this, wages and productivity had moved in tandem, meaning as productivity (the amount of goods or services a worker can produce in an hour) increased, so too did wages. However, since 1979, wages have failed to keep up with the rising productivity of workers.
1979 to 2024:
Productivity has increased by approximately 80.9% since 1979, meaning that the average worker today produces nearly 81% more than they did in 1979.
Wages, on the other hand, have only increased by around 29.4% during this time. This discrepancy between the growth in productivity and the stagnation of wages is a direct result of capital policies such as:
Deregulation and tax cuts for corporations and high-income earners.
The decline of unions, reducing workers' bargaining power.
The rise of financialization (e.g., stock buybacks, executive compensation) that focuses more on shareholder returns rather than reinvesting in labor or increasing wages.
This wage suppression—where profits have been funneled primarily to capital (business owners, executives, shareholders) instead of being shared with labor—has contributed to the wage-productivity gap, leaving millions of workers without the benefits of their own increased productivity.
2. Calculating the Wage Gap and Redistributing Capital Profits
To estimate the potential Universal Dividend Income, we need to look at the wage gap created by the productivity-wage divergence.
Median Wage vs. Hypothetical Wage (if wages had kept pace with productivity):
Median Hourly Wage in 1979 (in nominal dollars): $7.36
Adjusted for inflation to 2024 dollars: This equals approximately $22.00 to $23.00 per hour (based on the CPI).
Productivity Increase (1979 to 2024): Productivity has increased by 80.9%.
Hypothetical Median Wage (had wages kept pace with productivity): Hypothetical Median Wage = 22.00 × (1 + 0.809) = 22.00 × 1.809 = 39.80 per hour.
Actual Median Wage in 2024: Around $19.33 per hour.
Wage Difference: The difference between the hypothetical wage (if wages had kept pace with productivity) and the actual wage is: 39.80 - 19.33 = 20.47 per hour. For a full-time worker (approximately 173.2 hours per month): Monthly Wage Gap = 20.47 × 173.2 ≈ 3,543 per month.
Thus, each worker would theoretically have been earning an additional 3,543 per month had wages kept pace with productivity growth.
Redistribution of Capital Profits: The wage gap indicates that capital profits (from increased productivity) have not been fairly shared with labor. In this redistribution model, this increase would be shared among all 250 million legal adult citizens.
The wage increase per citizen per month can be calculated by: Monthly Redistribution per Adult = (250,000,000 × 3,543) / 333,000,000 ≈ 2,659 per adult per month.
Thus, 2,659 per month could be redistributed to each legal adult citizen, based on the wages they should have been earning had they been properly compensated for productivity growth.
3. Social Security, Welfare, and Other Government Payments
In addition to wage increases, the U.S. government provides various welfare programs, such as Social Security, food stamps, housing assistance, and Medicaid. These payments represent a significant source of income redistribution.
Total Annual Welfare Spending: The U.S. government spends approximately 3 trillion dollars per year on welfare programs.
Welfare Spending per Citizen: Annual Welfare Spending per Citizen = 3,000,000,000,000 / 333,000,000 ≈ 9,000 per citizen annually. Monthly Welfare Spending per Citizen = 9,000 / 12 ≈ 750 per citizen per month.
Thus, each citizen currently receives about 750 per month on average from welfare programs.
4. Combining the Two: The Universal Dividend Income
Now, let’s combine both the redistributed wage increase and the welfare payments:
Redistributed Wage Increase: 2,659 per adult per month.
Welfare and Social Security Payments: 750 per citizen per month.
Total monthly amount for each legal adult citizen would be: 2,659 + 750 = 3,409 per adult per month.
For Families with Children: Parents of dependent children would receive 1/3 of the adult amount for each child: 3,409 / 3 ≈ 1,136 per child per month.
5. Summary of Results: Universal Dividend Income
In this Universal Dividend Income model:
Adults (18+ years): Each legal adult citizen would receive around 3,409 per month.
Each Child: For each dependent child, parents would receive an additional 1,136 per month.
This model seeks to redistribute the income generated by increased productivity and the capital profits that have been hoarded since 1979, while also including welfare benefits into the equation. The result is a significant monthly payout that ensures more equitable distribution of wealth across all citizens, which could help combat rising inequality, provide a stronger safety net for families, and increase overall economic stability.
Conclusion:
The wage suppression since 1979—driven by capital policies and the decline of labor protections—has led to an economy where productivity has increased dramatically without a corresponding rise in worker wages. By redistributing the wage-productivity gap along with current welfare payments, the Universal Dividend Income model proposes a more equitable income distribution, offering 3,409 per month for each legal adult and a proportional amount for children. This would provide a substantial economic boost, particularly to low- and middle-income households, and could help restore economic stability and fairness.
This UDI is phase one of the biosecurity state. Of course, you'll have to be vaxxed and tracked to gain access to your crypto-income, eventually. They'll have total control of calories, and can turn off your calories, if you don't comply or because they don't like your DNA (for any reason, or none). I'm not buying what they're selling.
There were many points to my comment about the UDI, but to address your objection I would say that Social Security is widespread and has not been abused in the way you fear, not because we can trust Washington but because it is so widespread that such abuse would bring backlash from across Classes and ages (adult children that respond for parents sake but for their future.)
A reason to present the UDI is to display why and how badly Gov & Capital has treated us while depending on our tax and public resources. Had wages followed productivity each of our wages and salaries would be double while corporations would still be profiting as they were in late 1970's and earlier.
The Dividend aspect direct us all to consider it like SS pensions, all our working lives we paid into it, FICA, and so it is earned and not some freebe charity whim of Washington, our grandfathers, fathers, mothers, brothers, .., and we have been supporting corporate businesses with free R&D results, public resources, and tax-paid resources. The profits of the Trillions we spent and still spend are given-away and have been for generations of our labor.
You and family under UDI may still work and perhaps invest the extra. Consider the small business created and-or expanded, as well as new capital in stock purchases. The 'investment' Class would expand - perhaps including nearly everyone.
I hope this provides you a better perspective, and consideration of UDI. Let me know if you would like more detail or if you have specific objections not addressed.
God Bless., Steve
So, we Americans are supposed to take the USA company's offered payout, in exchange for our liberty, and in lieu of the real money (gold and silver) that we are owed (damages from fraud)? There is no such thing as a free agent. If you're an agent, you're not free. The incorporated USA already considers us to be its agents (all of us with birth certificates), but that is a fraud. When we pay federal taxes, we (of our own volition) participate in this corporation's fraud, extortion, and racketeering. Our ignorance of the law is no excuse. We, the complicit taxpayers, can be sued for damages in civil court for paying our federal taxes (an illegal protection racket).
I'd like us to notice the evil crimes that this corporation, the USA, is doing. The murders through chemical (medical) and biological warfare against the American people. The murders through foreign wars. Do we believe we are not personally culpable and liable for damages from the crimes that our federally contracted entity has done and is doing? Are we willing to correct our wrong beliefs, and become lawful people, or are we to continue to blunder along in our ignorance and complicity with this criminal organization?
yea, sure, exactly what you write.