14 Comments
User's avatar
Dennis O'Neill's avatar

It's odd how many trouble makers who threaten the MIC get killed. JFK was murdered because he was a huge threat.

Expand full comment
Palamambron's avatar

People don't get killed for telling lies.

Expand full comment
equinefriend's avatar

Glad you mentioned Anna von Reitz. Her information is what everyone needs to know. It should be brought up in senate and congressional hearings, but of course it isn't. I wonder how many of those sendators and congressmen even know about this information?

Expand full comment
Palamambron's avatar

The bank could be responding to her lawfare behind the scenes.

Expand full comment
equinefriend's avatar

What is your take on how would they be responding to think? In what way?

Expand full comment
Palamambron's avatar

The effort of the federal corporation to come into compliance with DOGE might have something to do with it. Trump is mentioned in the Von Reitz piece. The timing is interesting, kind of paralleling the Q poem, emerging in 2018. I don't think Trump is really a populist/loyalist, although I believe he's won three elections in a row. I think he works for the bank. He's an Orange Man, isn't he? The color revolution of Ukraine in 2014 when the bank took over is called the Orange Revolution. When the Bank of England and William of Orange deposed Charles the 2nd, that was the original Orange revolution. So, Orange Man Bad, I suppose. The orange man's job this time is to collapse the government. I expect the banks to call in all the mortgages when the housing insurance market collapses (they are required to by federal regulation, I think). I don't know if you read my post today or not. That will greatly reduce the money supply and be a huge property/land grab for the bank(s) and the federal corporation.

Expand full comment
equinefriend's avatar

Palambron, I don't know if you're familiar with Mike King or newstreason.com. it's an entirely different perspective than many of the brilliant substack writers such as yourself. Before I started watching these videos, one of which I've attached below, I would have agreed with you and the others. Now, however, I'm not so sure. I encourage you to watch this video. You can advance the counter to 7:15 to avoid their standard intro. If you watch it I'm very interested in your opinion. https://rumble.com/v6mtw19-q-news-review-with-mike-king-035-trump-putin-and-xi-were-in-cahoots-all-alo.html

Expand full comment
Palamambron's avatar

Got the video now.

Expand full comment
equinefriend's avatar

👍

Expand full comment
Palamambron's avatar

This link is taking me to his home page, but I don't see the video.

Expand full comment
Palamambron's avatar

"The Bottles stand as empty

As they were filled before.

Time that was in plenty

But from that cup no more." -- Grateful Dead's Ship of Fools

Expand full comment
equinefriend's avatar

I see. Okay, go to newsreason.com, then click on "channel 17 podcast on rumble," there you can click on any of the enumerated "Q News Review with Mike King.". He has made 35 of these podcasts. Thanks for letting me know.

Expand full comment
Tom Childs's avatar

So happy to see your opinion of America's general populace, equating it with a 'Ship of Fools'.

in the larger picture, it's unwise to call anyone a fool.... I think that's scriptural.

Expand full comment
Palamambron's avatar

The ship of fools is a symbol. The bible tells us not to call our brother a fool. Like all morals, this moral has been stretched by moralists to include any usage of the word fool in any context. I'm glad I'm not one of those.

Expand full comment