21 Comments
May 26Liked by Palamambron

The reason it has to be the Crown is the other nominees don't have M 15, M 16, SAS, The Royal Marines or anywhere near the wealth or the control of the nations.

They have a grip on the throat of every former dominion.

Expand full comment
author

You get it.

Expand full comment

I went and found out who Nails is. Not that Google helped, but Yandex did.

Nails is Lenny Dykstra... stud Philly baseball player from back in the day. I think he too was on that show.

Expand full comment
author

Rings a bell. That was his baseball nickname. He was tough as nails. I can't forget the John Kruk Phillies and the '89 penate. LD came over from the Mets and hit leadoff for them. The entity is interested in athletic talent and celebrity. There is a set of celebs who do things I don't understand at all. Charlie Sheen and Lenny Dykstra are both on that list. Add AJ, too. What makes these guys tick? https://www.reddit.com/r/baseball/comments/h906yp/lenny_dykstra_now_claims_that_ron_darling_faked/

Expand full comment

I was rooting for the Phillies! I recall the interview he did with Ron Darling about a decade ago. Money. Even look at his Twitter and he's still after it!

https://x.com/LennyDykstra

Expand full comment
author

I'm going to check out that search engine. I'm still using Presearch primarily. It's not as useful as it was a few years ago.

Expand full comment
May 26Liked by Palamambron

Are you familiar with the work of Frances Leader?

https://francesleader.substack.com/p/black-nobility-101?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment
author

I follow Francis Leader and Diana Barahona. There is a lot of discussion of the dark spiritual entity. For now, I want to focus on the dark corporate entity--the corporate ownership of the USA. Americans are being exploited by a British corporation. This style of foreign exploitation is as old as the stock company itself. Buying stock is lending money at interest or usury. It puts a layer of insulation between the capital investor and the corporate evil that must be done to secure the company's profit. What was called rationalism in Britain and Europe in the 18th century tastes to me like the apologetics of foreign exploitation. People in England who got rich off of foreign exploitation in that century were called Anglicans.

Expand full comment
deletedMay 26·edited May 26Liked by Palamambron
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Yes, the same group of "people" presenting different personas/aspects at different times and different places, since The Beginning.

Expand full comment
deletedMay 26Liked by Palamambron
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author
May 26·edited May 26Author

The prevailing system of manners in England and throughout the west are Frankish. Frankish manners are how Franks hide the fact that they absolutely despise everyone else. You know, the upper-class wealthy manners. In America, we emulate the manners of the wealthy and we should not. There is a more original system of manners in Britain...the Gaelic. Being polite to Gaelic people pisses us off. It makes us cuss and swear. Will Zoll did a series that showed how German investors took over the wealth of England after William of Orange. And because people like to be close to where their investments are working, many German Franks (and Prussians) moved to England. Their speech and manners came to be the accepted manners of the English upper class, while most nitty-gritty Londoners prefer Gaelic manners and course, vulgar interactions. I certainly do. That's why I include some vulgar language even though my audience is largely Christian (as I am).

Expand full comment
deletedMay 26Liked by Palamambron
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

That article is very interesting,

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for your comments. You know stuff that I don't know.

Expand full comment
deletedMay 26Liked by Palamambron
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

I appreciate you sharing interesting books in the public domain. That's one of my stated goals.

Expand full comment
Jun 9Liked by Palamambron

What books were those? The comments are deleted...

Expand full comment
author

https://archive.org/details/jewishprincedomi0000zuck/page/n5/mode/2up?view=theater It's called: A Jewish Princedom In Feudal France: 768-900.

Expand full comment
author

I posted a link to the pdf above in the thread. This guy showed up and posted about the book, not realizing the book has an expired copyright, and it's already been scanned into the archive. Then he deleted all his comments and his account. I have not read this book.

Expand full comment

That's very strange...

Expand full comment
deletedMay 26·edited May 26Liked by Palamambron
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Nice to see someone knows something about history.

Expand full comment
author

The copyright is 51 years old this year for the above book. I'll bet google has already put out an electronic copy. Maybe somebody already scanned it in. Yep: https://archive.org/details/jewishprincedomi0000zuck/page/n15/mode/2up?view=theater

Expand full comment
author

That's one reason American culture seems to be on a 50 year loop. Public domain laws.

Expand full comment
author

Also, university libraries kick out books when the copyrights expire and they hit the used books market.

Expand full comment